Seven points of dissent in government’s version of OROP by Satbir Singh front
- “The government has created avoidable confusion by including VRS (Voluntary Retirement Scheme) in its announcement as it does not exist in the Defence forces. However, those who have taken premature retirement must come under OROP,” Satbir said.
- The agitating veterans have also objected to the government taking the calendar year 2013 instead of financial year 2013-14 for fixing the base.
- “The Defence Minister had earlier assured us that the pensions would be taken from the top of the pay scales, but now the government seems to have gone to an unknown concept,” he said.
- The ex-servicemen are also opposed to the formation of a one-man judicial commission and demand that it should be composed of three ex-servicemen, one serving officer and a bureaucrat.
- Also, the deadline for the commission to come out with a report on the implementation of the OROP should be one month instead of the six as proposed by the government.
- The protesting veterans have also demanded that the OROP should be independent of the Central Pay Commission and the concept should be in perpetuity.
- Rejecting the government’s proposal of pension revision every five years, Satbir said, “We had agreed to even two years, but now we seek our original demand of revision every year.”
Source:indianexpress
The front led by Satbir Singh has rejected the government’s version of OROP and has put forward seven points of dissent.
“The government has created avoidable confusion by including VRS (Voluntary Retirement Scheme) in its announcement as it does not exist in the Defence forces.
However, those who have taken premature retirement must come under OROP,” Satbir said. The agitating veterans have also objected to the government taking the calendar year 2013 instead of financial year 2013-14 for fixing the base.
“The Defence Minister had earlier assured us that the pensions would be taken from the top of the pay scales, but now the government seems to have gone to an unknown concept,” he said.
The ex-servicemen are also opposed to the formation of a one-man judicial commission and demand that it should be composed of three ex-servicemen, one serving officer and a bureaucrat.
Also, the deadline for the commission to come out with a report on the implementation of the OROP should be one month instead of the six as proposed by the government.
The protesting veterans have also demanded that the OROP should be independent of the Central Pay Commission and the concept should be in perpetuity.
Rejecting the government’s proposal of pension revision every five years, Satbir said, “We had agreed to even two
years, but now we seek our original demand of revision every year.”
- See more at: http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-others/orop-ex-servicemen-threaten-fast-unto-death-if-anomalies-not-removed/#sthash.LZxMOHOV.dpuf
The front led by Satbir Singh has rejected the government’s version of OROP and has put forward seven points of dissent.
“The government has created avoidable confusion by including VRS (Voluntary Retirement Scheme) in its announcement as it does not exist in the Defence forces.
However, those who have taken premature retirement must come under OROP,” Satbir said. The agitating veterans have also objected to the government taking the calendar year 2013 instead of financial year 2013-14 for fixing the base.
“The Defence Minister had earlier assured us that the pensions would be taken from the top of the pay scales, but now the government seems to have gone to an unknown concept,” he said.
The ex-servicemen are also opposed to the formation of a one-man judicial commission and demand that it should be composed of three ex-servicemen, one serving officer and a bureaucrat.
Also, the deadline for the commission to come out with a report on the implementation of the OROP should be one month instead of the six as proposed by the government.
The protesting veterans have also demanded that the OROP should be independent of the Central Pay Commission and the concept should be in perpetuity.
Rejecting the government’s proposal of pension revision every five years, Satbir said, “We had agreed to even two
years, but now we seek our original demand of revision every year.”
- See more at: http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-others/orop-ex-servicemen-threaten-fast-unto-death-if-anomalies-not-removed/#sthash.LZxMOHOV.dpuf
The front led by Satbir Singh has rejected the government’s version of OROP and has put forward seven points of dissent.
“The government has created avoidable confusion by including VRS (Voluntary Retirement Scheme) in its announcement as it does not exist in the Defence forces.
However, those who have taken premature retirement must come under OROP,” Satbir said. The agitating veterans have also objected to the government taking the calendar year 2013 instead of financial year 2013-14 for fixing the base.
“The Defence Minister had earlier assured us that the pensions would be taken from the top of the pay scales, but now the government seems to have gone to an unknown concept,” he said.
The ex-servicemen are also opposed to the formation of a one-man judicial commission and demand that it should be composed of three ex-servicemen, one serving officer and a bureaucrat.
Also, the deadline for the commission to come out with a report on the implementation of the OROP should be one month instead of the six as proposed by the government.
The protesting veterans have also demanded that the OROP should be independent of the Central Pay Commission and the concept should be in perpetuity.
Rejecting the government’s proposal of pension revision every five years, Satbir said, “We had agreed to even two
years, but now we seek our original demand of revision every year.”
- See more at: http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-others/orop-ex-servicemen-threaten-fast-unto-death-if-anomalies-not-removed/#sthash.LZxMOHOV.dpuf
The front led by Satbir Singh has rejected the government’s version of OROP and has put forward seven points of dissent.
“The government has created avoidable confusion by including VRS (Voluntary Retirement Scheme) in its announcement as it does not exist in the Defence forces.
However, those who have taken premature retirement must come under OROP,” Satbir said. The agitating veterans have also objected to the government taking the calendar year 2013 instead of financial year 2013-14 for fixing the base.
“The Defence Minister had earlier assured us that the pensions would be taken from the top of the pay scales, but now the government seems to have gone to an unknown concept,” he said.
The ex-servicemen are also opposed to the formation of a one-man judicial commission and demand that it should be composed of three ex-servicemen, one serving officer and a bureaucrat.
Also, the deadline for the commission to come out with a report on the implementation of the OROP should be one month instead of the six as proposed by the government.
The protesting veterans have also demanded that the OROP should be independent of the Central Pay Commission and the concept should be in perpetuity.
Rejecting the government’s proposal of pension revision every five years, Satbir said, “We had agreed to even two
years, but now we seek our original demand of revision every year.”
- See more at: http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-others/orop-ex-servicemen-threaten-fast-unto-death-if-anomalies-not-removed/#sthash.LZxMOHOV.dpuf
The front led by Satbir Singh has rejected the government’s version of OROP and has put forward seven points of dissent.
“The government has created avoidable confusion by including VRS (Voluntary Retirement Scheme) in its announcement as it does not exist in the Defence forces.
However, those who have taken premature retirement must come under OROP,” Satbir said. The agitating veterans have also objected to the government taking the calendar year 2013 instead of financial year 2013-14 for fixing the base.
“The Defence Minister had earlier assured us that the pensions would be taken from the top of the pay scales, but now the government seems to have gone to an unknown concept,” he said.
The ex-servicemen are also opposed to the formation of a one-man judicial commission and demand that it should be composed of three ex-servicemen, one serving officer and a bureaucrat.
Also, the deadline for the commission to come out with a report on the implementation of the OROP should be one month instead of the six as proposed by the government.
The protesting veterans have also demanded that the OROP should be independent of the Central Pay Commission and the concept should be in perpetuity.
Rejecting the government’s proposal of pension revision every five years, Satbir said, “We had agreed to even two
years, but now we seek our original demand of revision every year.”
- See more at: http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-others/orop-ex-servicemen-threaten-fast-unto-death-if-anomalies-not-removed/#sthash.LZxMOHOV.dpuf
The front led by Satbir Singh has rejected the government’s version of OROP and has put forward seven points of dissent.
“The government has created avoidable confusion by including VRS (Voluntary Retirement Scheme) in its announcement as it does not exist in the Defence forces.
However, those who have taken premature retirement must come under OROP,” Satbir said. The agitating veterans have also objected to the government taking the calendar year 2013 instead of financial year 2013-14 for fixing the base.
“The Defence Minister had earlier assured us that the pensions would be taken from the top of the pay scales, but now the government seems to have gone to an unknown concept,” he said.
The ex-servicemen are also opposed to the formation of a one-man judicial commission and demand that it should be composed of three ex-servicemen, one serving officer and a bureaucrat.
Also, the deadline for the commission to come out with a report on the implementation of the OROP should be one month instead of the six as proposed by the government.
The protesting veterans have also demanded that the OROP should be independent of the Central Pay Commission and the concept should be in perpetuity.
Rejecting the government’s proposal of pension revision every five years, Satbir said, “We had agreed to even two
years, but now we seek our original demand of revision every year.”
- See more at: http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-others/orop-ex-servicemen-threaten-fast-unto-death-if-anomalies-not-removed/#sthash.LZxMOHOV.dpuf
The front led by Satbir Singh has rejected the government’s version of OROP and has put forward seven points of dissent.
“The government has created avoidable confusion by including VRS (Voluntary Retirement Scheme) in its announcement as it does not exist in the Defence forces.
However, those who have taken premature retirement must come under OROP,” Satbir said. The agitating veterans have also objected to the government taking the calendar year 2013 instead of financial year 2013-14 for fixing the base.
“The Defence Minister had earlier assured us that the pensions would be taken from the top of the pay scales, but now the government seems to have gone to an unknown concept,” he said.
The ex-servicemen are also opposed to the formation of a one-man judicial commission and demand that it should be composed of three ex-servicemen, one serving officer and a bureaucrat.
Also, the deadline for the commission to come out with a report on the implementation of the OROP should be one month instead of the six as proposed by the government.
The protesting veterans have also demanded that the OROP should be independent of the Central Pay Commission and the concept should be in perpetuity.
Rejecting the government’s proposal of pension revision every five years, Satbir said, “We had agreed to even two
years, but now we seek our original demand of revision every year.”
- See more at: http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-others/orop-ex-servicemen-threaten-fast-unto-death-if-anomalies-not-removed/#sthash.LZxMOHOV.dpuf
The front led by Satbir Singh has rejected the government’s version of OROP and has put forward seven points of dissent.
“The government has created avoidable confusion by including VRS (Voluntary Retirement Scheme) in its announcement as it does not exist in the Defence forces.
However, those who have taken premature retirement must come under OROP,” Satbir said. The agitating veterans have also objected to the government taking the calendar year 2013 instead of financial year 2013-14 for fixing the base.
“The Defence Minister had earlier assured us that the pensions would be taken from the top of the pay scales, but now the government seems to have gone to an unknown concept,” he said.
The ex-servicemen are also opposed to the formation of a one-man judicial commission and demand that it should be composed of three ex-servicemen, one serving officer and a bureaucrat.
Also, the deadline for the commission to come out with a report on the implementation of the OROP should be one month instead of the six as proposed by the government.
The protesting veterans have also demanded that the OROP should be independent of the Central Pay Commission and the concept should be in perpetuity.
Rejecting the government’s proposal of pension revision every five years, Satbir said, “We had agreed to even two
years, but now we seek our original demand of revision every year.”
- See more at: http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-others/orop-ex-servicemen-threaten-fast-unto-death-if-anomalies-not-removed/#sthash.LZxMOHOV.dpuf
The front led by Satbir Singh has rejected the government’s version of OROP and has put forward seven points of dissent.
“The government has created avoidable confusion by including VRS (Voluntary Retirement Scheme) in its announcement as it does not exist in the Defence forces.
However, those who have taken premature retirement must come under OROP,” Satbir said. The agitating veterans have also objected to the government taking the calendar year 2013 instead of financial year 2013-14 for fixing the base.
“The Defence Minister had earlier assured us that the pensions would be taken from the top of the pay scales, but now the government seems to have gone to an unknown concept,” he said.
The ex-servicemen are also opposed to the formation of a one-man judicial commission and demand that it should be composed of three ex-servicemen, one serving officer and a bureaucrat.
Also, the deadline for the commission to come out with a report on the implementation of the OROP should be one month instead of the six as proposed by the government.
The protesting veterans have also demanded that the OROP should be independent of the Central Pay Commission and the concept should be in perpetuity.
Rejecting the government’s proposal of pension revision every five years, Satbir said, “We had agreed to even two
years, but now we seek our original demand of revision every year.”
- See more at: http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-others/orop-ex-servicemen-threaten-fast-unto-death-if-anomalies-not-removed/#sthash.LZxMOHOV.dpuf
Add new comment